Politics

Your Ad Here

Mexican Army Illegally Killing Illegal Killers

by editor on Jul.15, 2009, under Politics

drugs_are_bad_mexicoThe ‘War on Drugs‘ has taken an interesting turn along the Mexican border as military officials have begun breaking the law in an attempt to preserve the law:

The Mexican army has carried out forced disappearances, acts of torture and illegal raids in pursuit of drug traffickers, according to documents and interviews with victims, their families, political leaders and human rights monitors. — The Washington Post, 2009

Unfortunately these practices have produced zero net results in stopping the flow of drugs into this country, and perhaps it is time to ramp things up to meet these challenges with appropriate force. Rather than simply disappearing and torturing suspected drug traffickers, why not behead them with rusted machetes? TheĀ  severed cabezas could then be rolled down the streets of Juarez like bowling balls to send a message that drug trafficking and violence simply WILL NOT be tolerated anymore, sort of a ’strike’ if you will.

Better yet, the Federales could film the beheadings and stream them live over the Internet for the entire world to see in gruesome detail. Such a display of brutal force is sure to ‘Shock and Awe‘ cartel leaders, undoubtedly forcing them to change their illegal narcotics distribution practices to try and prevent the loss of anymore beloved comrades.

For too long the US & Mexican governments have been soft on drug trafficking, using their ‘courts’ and ‘laws’ which have clearly been too weak to be effective in ending this madness once and for all. Total annihilation is the only way to win this war, and with the clock ticking it may be time to consider the nuclear option. If we could just get rid of these damn Mexicans once and for all, then who would be left to peddle these horrible substances to the innocent, unwitting American public? No one, thats who…

Inspiration @ The Washington Post

Leave a Comment :, , , , , Read more...

Newt Gingrich, The Family Values Adulterer

by editor on Jul.08, 2009, under Politics

Newt Gingrich has re-emerged on the national scene to promote his latest incarnation of the famed ‘Contract with America‘ – the 2010 version. Some may recall the originalĀ  ‘Contract’ penned in 1994 that contained both a ‘Personal Responsibility Act’ and ‘Family Reinforcement Act’ which were created in the spirit of ‘Family Values’, a platform that Newt and his conservative comrades have been pushing onto the American public as aggressively as Larry Craig pursuing anonymous gay sex in a public restroom. Pretty intense!

I wonder which one of Newt’s three families appreciates the ‘extramarital affair’ value the most…


Leave a Comment :, , , , , Read more...

If Its Warm & It Vibrates You Might Have Sex With It

by editor on Jul.06, 2009, under Politics

At first it may seem like this video needs no introduction, but to fully grasp the insanity it helps to put things in context. The following is an audio clip from an airing of The Alan Colmes Show circa 2005 where Mr. Colmes interviewed a man named Neal Horsely, a one-time Republican who left the GOP to form ‘The Creator’s Rights’ Party’ which to date has yet to have a single political victory, and may only have a single participating member.

The interesting thing about Horsely, besides this interview, is that he claims to be an advocate for militant pro-life, which loosely translated means he wishes to kill doctors’ who kill babies – sort of an anti/pro-death platform which makes about as much sense as banging a watermelon. Confused? You won’t be after you hear this…


Leave a Comment :, , , , Read more...

Mark Sanford Is An Invertebrate Douchebag

by editor on Jul.05, 2009, under Politics

Mark Sanford, the soon to be former governor of South Carolina and emerging national embarrassment for the Republican party apparently has a bit more explaining to do beyond just his Argentinean itinerary issues. Back in 1998 Sanford was vehemently opposed to allowing Clinton to remain in office following his affair with Monica Lewinsky and is on the record as saying:

This is “very damaging stuff,” Sanford declared at one point, when details of Clinton’s conduct became known. “I think it would be much better for the country and for him personally (to resign)… I come from the business side,” he said. “If you had a chairman or president in the business world facing these allegations, he’d be gone.”
Explaining his decision to back impeachment articles against Clinton, he added, “I think what he did in this matter was reprehensible… I feel very comfortable with my vote.”

Reprehensible eh? Strong words from the soon to be former governor – I wonder if he’ll be as adamant in demanding resignation this time around…


1 Comment :, , , Read more...

Need Something? Search Here

Use the form below to search the site:

You Got Beef? Speak up son! Get off the sidelines and leave a comment...

Diatribe Archives

The whole shebang listed chronologically...